Meta Faces New Mexico Trial Over Youth Addiction Claims

Meta is facing a trial in Santa Fe, New Mexico, that could result in court-ordered changes to how Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp operate, according to Reuters. Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed the lawsuit accusing Meta of designing its products to addict young users and failing to protect them from sexual exploitation. A March jury verdict found Meta violated state consumer protection law and awarded $375 million in damages.

Proposed Remedies and Meta's Opposition

New Mexico plans to seek additional damages and remedies during the trial. The state's proposed fixes include age verification requirements, limits on autoplay and infinite scroll features for minors, rejection of underage accounts with 99% accuracy, a firm 90-hour monthly limit on Meta's platforms, and establishment of a court-appointed Child Safety Monitor to oversee children's online safety with power to inspect Meta's internal systems. The state also wants Meta to limit end-to-end encryption for minors and fund the Child Safety Monitor role for at least five years.

Meta has opposed these demands, arguing they are impractical and unsupported by evidence. The company has warned that court-ordered changes could force it to withdraw from the state.

Broader Regulatory Context

The New Mexico case is part of a wider regulatory push against tech companies that focuses on product design rather than content alone. A California jury recently held Meta and Google liable for harm to a woman who compulsively used Meta's apps and Google's YouTube as a child, treating the services as defective products due to alleged addictive design. This verdict is expected to shape other similar cases.

The regulatory approach aligns with rules such as the European Union's Digital Services Act, which requires large online platforms to take steps addressing systemic risks to minors, including risks from features designed to drive excessive use such as infinite scroll. These cases collectively seek to hold platforms accountable for how their products are built in addition to what users post on them.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
CandleWickPoetvip
· 05-05 18:59
The court forcibly mandates changes to product features? This is rare in the history of technology. Once the ruling was issued, TikTok and YouTube all trembled in fear.
View OriginalReply0
ThereIsTvlInTheWindvip
· 05-03 02:21
Meta is finally going to be educated in court; the issue of adolescent addiction has long needed regulation.
View OriginalReply0
OneMoreReorgvip
· 05-03 02:10
Torrez is targeting product design itself, which is more deadly than fines — directly attacking Meta's core.
View OriginalReply0
CatMarketAnalysisAssistantvip
· 05-03 02:01
Wait, how did WhatsApp get involved too? It's not a short video platform, so the addictive logic isn't quite the same.
View OriginalReply0
OracleSkepticvip
· 05-03 01:55
The lawsuit in New Mexico is quite fierce. If it really gets decided, Facebook and Instagram's algorithm recommendation systems might have to change significantly.
View OriginalReply0