Bitcoin Post-Quantum Migration Harder Than Taproot, Project Eleven CEO Says

BTC-1.44%

Alex Pruden, CEO of Project Eleven, stated that Bitcoin's post-quantum migration will be more difficult than the Taproot upgrade and should begin immediately. According to Pruden, the asymmetry between acting on a post-quantum signature scheme today and waiting for certainty about quantum-computing hardware timelines means Bitcoin developers should move from research into production.

Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Urgency

Pruden's argument centers on the timing dilemma: delaying action until quantum computing threats are fully understood carries greater risk than beginning the migration process now, even amid ongoing research and uncertainty about hardware development timelines.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
BlackVelvetKeyvip
· 05-09 14:24
Taproot is just an optimization at the script layer; post-quantum cryptography involves the entire signature system, and the scale of that effort is fundamentally different. The CEO is right—it's better to start sooner, even if it's just to discuss standards first.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeUnderTheMoonlightvip
· 05-07 02:11
Post-quantum migration is indeed much more complex than Taproot, after all, it involves replacing underlying cryptographic primitives.
View OriginalReply0
GaslightPoetvip
· 05-07 02:09
Starting the layout now is wise; waiting until quantum computers actually arrive might be too late, as on-chain assets could already be compromised by then.
View OriginalReply0